A curated reading and viewing space for the ideas shaping education in the age of generative AI. The aim is not to tell readers what to think, but to keep the discussion grounded in research, policy, pedagogy and human development.
A starting collection of peer-reviewed and open-access scholarship on large language models, academic integrity, assessment, revision and the changing role of AI in education.
Kasneci and colleagues examine educational opportunities and risks, stressing the need for critical thinking, fact-checking, human oversight and clear pedagogical strategies.
Lo reviews early education research on ChatGPT across teaching, learning and assessment, including emerging benefits and risks.
A multicultural study exploring how generative AI is reshaping higher education, with particular attention to academic integrity and reform.
This review considers assessment at student, teacher and institutional levels and argues for stronger self-regulation, responsibility and integrity in an AI-rich environment.
McGrath, Farazouli and Cerratto-Pargman review empirical research after the release of ChatGPT and map an emerging field of educational practice and concern.
This study examines how learners revise AI-labelled and peer-labelled texts, including how writing experience and trust in AI relate to revision behaviour.
The Studio's philosophy sits within a wider international conversation about human agency, responsible use, privacy, pedagogy and the role of educators.
UNESCO's guidance addresses human agency, privacy, age-appropriate use, ethical validation, pedagogical design and policy frameworks for generative AI in education and research.
UNESCO educators discuss opportunity, over-reliance, deep reading, ethical concerns and the importance of creativity and critical thinking.
Watch on YouTube ↗A UNESCO discussion on how teachers' roles evolve as AI changes classrooms and why human expertise remains central.
Watch on YouTube ↗We can add selected Instagram conversations here as the Studio's official social channels and preferred posts are confirmed.
Research and policy are part of the conversation. The Studio brings that conversation back to the writer through a visible process of development.
Collect ideas, evidence, experiences, observations, questions and possibilities before trying to polish sentences.
Build strong structures that organise and support the ideas the writer wants the reader to follow.
Assemble, move and test ideas. A draft is a place to build, not a demand for instant perfection.
Grammar, punctuation, spelling, sentence construction, clarity and presentation come after meaning has been built.
Distance creates space for fresh judgement.
What can I now do? What improved? What still needs work? What should I try next?
Move the writing from private development to an audience. Future Studio ideas include the Writers' Showcase and AI Bookshelf — Unlimited Audience.
Follow development updates, beta news and conversations around literacy and responsible AI use.
Join the Next Move Community